ISSN:
1432-072X
Keywords:
Thiobacillus acidophilus
;
Acidophiles
;
Mixotrophic growth
;
Chemostat cultures
;
Formate metabolism
;
Formaldehyde metabolism
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Abstract Although the facultatively autotrophic acidophile Thiobacillus acidophilus is unable to grow on formate and formaldehyde in batch cultures, cells from glucose-limited chemostat cultures exhibited substrate-dependent oxygen uptake with these C1-compounds. Oxidation of formate and formaldehyde was uncoupler-sensitive, suggesting that active transport was involved in the metabolism of these compounds. Formate- and formaldehyde-dependent oxygen uptake was strongly inhibited at substrate concentrations above 150 and 400 μM, respectively. However, autotrophic formate-limited chemostat cultures were obtained by carefully increasing the formate to glucose ratio in the reservoir medium of mixotrophic chemostat cultures. The molar growth yield on formate (Y=2.5 g ·mol-1 at a dilution rate of 0.05 h-1) and RuBPCase activities in cell-free extracts suggested that T. acidophilus employs the Calvin cycle for carbon assimilation during growth on formate. T. acidophilus was unable to utilize the C1-compounds methanol and methylamine. Formate-dependent oxygen uptake was expressed constitutively under a variety of growth conditions. Cell-free extracts contained both dye-linked and NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase activities. NAD-dependent oxidation of formaldehyde required reduced glutathione. In addition, cell-free extracts contained a dye-linked formaldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Mixotrophic growth yields were higher than the sum of the heterotrophic and autotrophic yields. A quantitative analysis of the mixotrophic growth studies revealed that formaldehyde was a more effective energy source than formate.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00248839
Permalink
