ISSN:
1432-2048
Keywords:
Hypersensitivity
;
Necrogenesis
;
Nicotiana
;
Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase
;
Protoplasts
;
Tobacco mosaic virus
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Abstract Leaves of tobacco varieties carrying the N gene for hypersensitiviy react to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infection by forming necrotic lesions and by localizing the virus in the vicinity of these lesions. These changes are accompanied in the host by an increased metabolic activity, in particular by an increased production of phenolic compounds derived from phenylalanine. Necrogenesis apparently destroys cells which have become heavily infected despite this strong defense reaction. However, it has been demonstrated previously (Otsuki et al., 1972) that protoplasts derived from leaves which normally respond in vivo to virus inoculation by forming necrotic local lesions, show no such response when inoculated in vitro. In the present study we have investigated the effect of pre-infecting hypersensitive leaves with TMV on the production or the non-production of the factor(s) of necrosis at the level of either protoplasts or mesophyll cells isolated from these preinfected leaves. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), whose rate of synthesis has been shown (Duchesne et al., 1977) to increase in stimulated cells of infected leaves, was used as a biochemical marker in the search for the stimulus preceding necrogenesis. We found that this stimulus concerning PAL activity was never elicited in either protoplasts or mesophyll cells which were prepared just before the appearance of necrotic local lesions. This result did not depend on the conditions of pre-infection or on the methods used to isolate the protoplasts or mesophyll cells. We also assayed samples derived from pre-infected leaves that were already carrying local lesions, i.e., in which the stimulus and necrogenesis were already operating: not only did the isolated protoplasts and mesophyll cells not sustain the stimulus concerning PAL activity, but the stimulated enzyme activity decreased abruptly and, in most of the experiments, had disappeared within the time necessary for maceration. Evidence is presented showing that the non-elicitation or the abrupt decrease of stimulated PAL activity could not result from a selection of unstimulated cells or from a preferential destruction of stimulated cells during maceration of the leaves. Our results support the view that hypertonic osmotic pressure is responsible for the non-occurence of the hypersensitive response by acting according to one or both of the following processes: it suppresses the contacts through plasmodesmata between neighboring cells and, hence, it also suppresses the cell-to-cell diffusion of the factor(s) eliciting the stimulus; and/or since hypertonic osmotic pressure causes striking differences between leaf cells and protoplasts in total RNA and protein synthesis, these differences might include the suppression of synthesis of the elicitor of hypersensitivity.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00380859
Permalink
