ALBERT

Description: Electric dipole transition matrix elements for rovibrational transitions in the X (sup 1)Sigma(sup +) state of the CO minor isotopes (14)C(16)O and (13)C(17)O are calculated for the first time for all the delta v = +1, +2, and +3 transitions for which v less than or equal to 20 and J less than or equal to 150. Improved electric dipole transition matrix elements are also calculated for the minor isotopes (12)C(17)O, (12)C(18)O, (13)C(18)O. We have fitted polynomials to these matrix elements as a function of the parameter m which is defined in terms of the lower state angular momentum quantum number J; the convenient to use polynomial representations are given in tabular form. These results for the minor species of CO complement those previously reported by us for (12)C(16)O and (13)C(16)O.

Description: Improved electric dipole transition matrix elements for rovibrational transitions in the ground state X(1)Sigma(+) of (12)C(6)O and (13)C(16)O are calculated for all the delta v = +1, +2, and +3 transitions for which v less than or equal to 20 and J less than or equal to 150. We have fitted polynomials to these matrix elements as a function of the parameter m which is defined in terms of the lower state angular momentum quantum number J. These convenient to use polynomial representations are given in Tables 1-4 for (12)C(16)O and in Tables 5-8 for (13)C(16)O. We observe that there is intensity enhancement due to vibration-rotation interaction for the P-branch transitions at the expense of the R-branch transitions for delta v = +1. This enhancement can be as large as 40% at the highest J. For the delta v = +2 and +3 transitions, the R-branch transitions are enhanced by as much as a factor of 2.75 and 10 at the highest J, respectively. The P-branch transitions exhibit only minor decreases. Comparisons with previous calculations show good agreement for the delta v = +1 transitions. The comparison for delta v = +2 and +3 transitions show differences as large as a factor of 5.

Description: Belmiloud, et al have recently suggested that the HITRAN line intensities in the 1130 nm water vapor band are much too weak. Giver, et at corrected unit conversion errors to make the HITRAN intensities compatible with the original measurements of Mandin, et al, but Belmiloud, et al believe that many of those line intensity measurements were too weak, and they propose the total intensity of the 1130 nm water vapor band is 38% stronger than the sum of the HITRAN line intensities in this region. We have made independent assessments of this proposal using 2 spectra obtained with the Ames 25 meter base path White cell. The first was made using the moderate resolution (8 nm) solar spectral flux radiometer (SSFR) flight instrument with a White cell absorbing path of 506 meters and 10 torr water vapor pressure. Modeling this spectrum using the HITRAN linelist gives a reasonable match, and the model is not compatible when the HITRAN line intensities are increased by 38%. The second spectrum was obtained with a White cell path of 1106 meters and 12 torr water vapor pressure, using a Bomem FTIR with near Doppler width resolution. This spectrum is useful for measuring intensities of isolated weak lines to compare with the measurements of Mandin, et al. Unfortunately, as Belmiloud et al point out, at these conditions the strong lines are much too saturated for good intensity measurements. Our measurements of the weak lines are in reasonable agreement with those of Mandin, et al. Neither of our spectra supports the proposal of Belmiloud et al for a general 38% increase of the absorption intensity in the 1130 nm water vapor band.