Electronic Resource
Springer
Journal of business ethics
5 (1986), S. 501-509
ISSN:
1573-0697
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Philosophy
,
Economics
Notes:
Abstract De George's account of philosophical and theological approaches to business ethics presupposes a particular view of the logic of argumentation. This paper presents an alternative model for describing arguments that has been suggested by Stephen Toulmin. It uses this model to qualify De George's claim that philosophers are justified in their indifference to the work of theologians in business ethics. Consider what you think justice requires, and decide accordingly. But never give your reasons; for your judgment will probably be right, but your reasons will certainly be wrong. Lord Mansfield
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00380756
Permalink
|
Location |
Call Number |
Expected |
Availability |