ALBERT

Description: SUMMARYField experiments with the South American grain crop, quinoa, were carried out at two sites in Denmark in 1988–90 in order to study the effects of varying the nitrogen fertilization rate, seed rate, row spacing, harvesting method and harvest date. Although there was a significant yield increase when the amount of nitrogen fertilizer was increased from 40 to 160 kg N/ha, quinoa seems to be well adapted to poor soils. Yield decreased by 24–1% when the nitrogen supply was reduced from 160 to 40 kg N/ha, while the yield decrease was 120 and 2–7% when the nitrogen supply was reduced to 80 and 120 kg/ha, respectively.A model expressing yield as a function of plant density, for three experiments analysed as one, showed an optimal plant density with respect to yield of 327 ± 220 plants/m2. This plant density was the top point of the curve relating yield to plant density. However, the large standard deviation indicates that apparently a rather wide range of plant densities would provide similar yields. When the row spacing was varied, it was shown that plots with a row spacing of 50 cm, which were hoed, gave a higher yield than plots with 25 or 12·5 cm row spacing, which were unhoed. There was an overall increase in yield when changing from combined harvesting to swathing; however, when comparing the yields from the optimal harvest dates for the two methods, no yield differences could be detected. The optimal harvest date for swathing was found to be the stage when the inflorescences start to turn brown, whereas for combining, the optimal harvest date was the stage when most of the inflorescences are already brown.

Description: SUMMARYYield responses of a grain amaranth accession to different irrigation strategies were evaluated in Naples, Italy. Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative response of amaranth under combined abiotic stresses (salinity and drought) in a Mediterranean environment of South Italy affected by problems due to groundwater salinization from seawater intrusion.A comparison was made in 2009 and 2010 between a fully irrigated treatment (1·00), with the restitution of all of the water necessary to replenish to field capacity the soil layer explored by roots (0·00–0·36 m), and two treatments with restitution of 0·50 and 0·25 of the water volume used for the fully irrigated treatment. The three levels of irrigation volume were combined with two levels of salinity, either fresh or salt water, with electrical conductivity (EC) of the irrigation water of 0·64 and 22 dS/m respectively, in a factorial experiment thus harbouring six treatments in a randomized complete block design. The results showed good adaptation of amaranth to drought. It was possible to obtain high yields even if groundwater with infiltrated seawater was used for irrigation (50% yield reduction when the EC of soil saturated paste extract (ECe) was 13·97 dS/m). A reduction of 50% in the volume of irrigation did not cause a significant reduction in yield, whether using fresh or saline water, compared to the treatment fully irrigated with fresh water. The chemical composition of amaranth seeds, however, was significantly affected by the treatments. Starch and ash content decreased with increasing drought while protein content was increased by both salt and drought.In view of the increased presence of salinity and drought stress in the Mediterranean area and the scarce information on amaranth response to salt and water stress, the aim of the present work is evaluation of the quantitative and qualitative response of amaranth grown in a Mediterranean environment of South Italy under combined drought and salinity stress.