ALBERT

Description: Abstract 687 Background: A persistently positive PET scan after just a few cycles of therapy is predictive of a poor clinical outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Prior data suggested that about one third of patients remain PET positive after 2–4 cycles, with ≤ 20% 2 year progression-free survival (PFS) for such patients. A response-adapted strategy was studied in E3404 to test the hypothesis that an early treatment change to four cycles of R-ICE might reduce the treatment failure rate of patients whose PET scan remained positive after an initial 3 cycles of R-CHOP. Study Design: Previously untreated patients with DLBCL stage III, IV, or bulky II, with measurable disease, HIV negative, and with adequate organ reserve, were eligible. PET/CT scan was performed before treatment and again after 3 cycles of R-CHOP. A fourth cycle of R-CHOP was given while the scan was centrally reviewed and scored as either positive or negative for FDG-avid tumor by a single reviewer using criteria based on modifications of the Harmonization Criteria. Persistently PET-positive patients received 4 cycles of R-ICE, while PET-negative patients received 2 more cycles of R-CHOP, for a total of 6 cycles. PET/CT was performed again at the end of treatment. A ≥45% 2 year PFS for mid-treatment PET- positive patients was viewed as a promising result, with 88% power if 33 such patients were accrued. Total accrual of 99 patients was therefore planned. Results: Of 100 patients accrued, 78 were eligible; all but 1 ineligibility was based on central pathology review. Fifty-eight were male; median age was 62 years (20–74); 13% IPI 0–1, 31% IPI 2, 37% IPI 3, and 19% IPI 4–5. Seventy-four of 78 (95%) patients completed the first 3 cycles of R-CHOP. Of 72 patients continuing treatment, 67 (93%) completed protocol treatment: 83% of mid-treatment PET-positive and 93% of PET-negative patients. Of 74 patients undergoing mid-treatment PET scan, 12 (16%) were scored as positive, and 62 (84%) as negative. At the end of treatment, 13% were scored as positive, and 87% as negative. Two-year PFS, from the time of study entry, was 72% among all eligible patients. Two year PFS from the time of mid-treatment PET scan was 45% (90% CI, 21–67%) for patients scored as mid-treatment PET-positive, and 77% (90% CI 67–85%) for patients scored as mid-treatment PET-negative. The 80% confidence interval (corresponding to a test with a one-sided type I error of 10%) did not include the null hypothesis of 25%, implying that the results met the pre-specified threshold. Among all 78 eligible patients, 10 have died (13%); 5-year overall survival was 87% (90% CI 78–92%) Three-year overall survival was 67% (90% CI 40–84%) for mid-treatment PET-positive patients, and 93% (90% CI 85–97%) for mid-treatment PET-negative patients. Conclusions: The 2-year PFS for mid-treatment PET-positive patients met the threshold to be considered promising, but the confidence interval was wider than expected due to the small patient number. In addition, the inter-observer variability in the interpretation of mid-treatment PET scans as a binary variable in this study (studied and reported separately in Horning SJ et al. Blood 2010) implies that treatment modification based on early PET scanning should remain confined to clinical trials. Disclosures: Swinnen: Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. Quon:Genentech: Research Funding. Advani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kahl:Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Horning:Genentech: Employment; Roche: stock, stock Other.

Description: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mostly incurable malignancy arising from naive B cells (NBCs) in the mantle zone of lymph nodes. We analyzed genomewide methylation in MCL patients with the HELP (HpaII tiny fragment Enrichment by Ligation–mediated PCR) assay and found significant aberrancy in promoter methylation patterns compared with normal NBCs. Using biologic and statistical criteria, we further identified 4 hypermethylated genes CDKN2B, MLF-1, PCDH8, and HOXD8 and 4 hypomethylated genes CD37, HDAC1, NOTCH1, and CDK5 when aberrant methylation was associated with inverse changes in mRNA levels. Immunohistochemical analysis of an independent cohort of MCL patient samples confirmed CD37 surface expression in 93% of patients, validating its selection as a target for MCL therapy. Treatment of MCL cell lines with a small modular immunopharmaceutical (CD37-SMIP) resulted in significant loss of viability in cell lines with intense surface CD37 expression. Treatment of MCL cell lines with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine resulted in reversal of aberrant hypermethylation and synergized with the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid in induction of the hypermethylated genes and anti-MCL cytotoxicity. Our data show prominent and aberrant promoter methylation in MCL and suggest that differentially methylated genes can be targeted for therapeutic benefit in MCL.

Description: Key Points Plasma EBV-DNA is highly concordant with EBV tumor status in Hodgkin lymphoma. Plasma EBV-DNA has prognostic significance in Hodgkin lymphoma, both before therapy and at month 6 of follow-up.

Description: Introduction Alkylating agent-rituximab combinations are a current standard of care for patients with iNHL. Most iNHL will eventually become refractory to current therapies. Particularly, once iNHL becomes “double-refractory” to rituximab + alkylating agents, there are few data available on beneficial therapeutic options and development of novel therapies is essential for this patient population. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ, demonstrated considerable activity in recurrent iNHL in a phase 1 trial (Kahl, ICML 2011). We thus evaluated idelalisib in a phase 2 trial for patients with double-refractory iNHL, an area of unmet medical need. We present mature response data and extended follow-up of this study. Methods Eligible iNHL patients (pts) included those with measurable disease who were refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory status was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of therapy, documented by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2013, 8 months after the last patient enrolled. Results Enrolled pts (N=125) had a median age of 64 years [range 33-87] and were 64% male. Indolent NHL subtypes included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], most common regimens included bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and 14 pts (11%) had a prior autologous transplant. 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. Median time since completion of last regimen was 3.9 months. At baseline, pts had elevated LDH (30%), bulky disease 〉7 cm (26%), anemia ≥grade 1 (51%), neutropenia ≥ grade 1 (24%), and thrombocytopenia ≥grade 1 (34%). With a median follow up 9.4 months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 57% (95% CI = 47.6, 65.6) with 71 responders, comprising 7 CRs (6%), 63 PRs (50%), and 1 minor response (MR) in a WM pt. There were 42 pts with stable disease (SD) (33%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden (Figure 1). Median time to response was 1.9 months (range 1.6-8.3), median time to CR was 3.7 months (range 1.9-12). ORR for iNHL subtypes was: FL (54%), SLL (61%), LPL/WM (80%), and MZL (47%). ORR for bendamustine refractory pts was 59%. ORR for pts with

Description: Phosphoinositide-3 kinases (PI3Ks) are key cellular signaling proteins that act as a central node, relaying signals from cell surface receptors to downstream mediators such as AKT. The PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoforms are preferentially expressed in normal and malignant leukocytes where they play critical roles in cell differentiation, migration, and proliferation. IPI-145 is a potent, oral PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in the Phase 1 trial (IPI-145-02) in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01476657). Cytokines, chemokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play key roles in the homing, migration and activation of normal immune cells, and can have similar effects on malignant leukocytes. To further explore the biological effects of IPI-145, a panel of cytokines, chemokines, and MMPs were evaluated at several time points in the serum of patients enrolled in the IPI-145-02 trial. Serum was collected from consenting subjects at baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 (C1D8), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1). Serum was frozen and stored at -80°C prior to analysis. Serum proteins were analyzed using Luminex xMAP(®) technology in which analytes are captured on uniquely labeled fluorescent beads, and the amount of analyte is quantified using an LED CCD camera contained in Millipore's MagPix(®) instrument. Multiplex panels of cytokines, chemokines and MMPs covering 72 analytes were evaluated in 30 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 19 indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) subjects. Each sample was tested in duplicate, and duplicate measurements were averaged. Measurements were excluded from further analysis if duplicate readings exhibited a coefficient of variation of greater than 20% or if all values for a specific analyte and subject were below the limit of detection. Each analyte was evaluated for evidence of a consistent change (reduction or increase) in serum levels at C1D8 and/or C2D1 compared to baseline. When data were compared between CLL subjects treated with IPI-145 at 25 mg twice daily (BID) and those treated at 75 mg BID, no clear differences in serum analyte levels were observed, although the population subgroups were relatively small. For the purposes of this analysis, all doses were pooled together (n=1 at 8 mg BID, 2 at 15 mg BID, 15 at 25 mg BID, and 13 at 75 mg BID). Likewise, the iNHL dose groups were also pooled (n=1 at 15 mg BID, 12 at 25 mg BID, 1 at 50 mg BID, and 5 at 75 mg BID). In CLL subjects, 9 of 72 analytes decreased after IPI-145 treatment compared to baseline, whereas none increased significantly. Analytes that decreased after IPI-145 treatment include CXCL13, CCL3, CCL4, IL-10, TNFα, IL-12p40, MMP-9, CCL17 and CCL22. Median serum levels of these analytes decreased by C1D8, ranging from 16% to 59% of baseline. In iNHL subjects, median serum levels of 7 analytes decreased by C1D8 (ranging from 32% to 70% of baseline), whereas none increased significantly. Of the 7 analytes that decreased in iNHL subjects, 5 also decreased in CLL subjects (CXCL13, MMP-9, TNFα, CCL17 and CCL22) and 2 were distinct (CCL1 and MMP-12). Interestingly, many of the analytes that decreased with IPI-145 treatment are involved in the communication between malignant B-cells and the microenvironment. CCL3, CCL4, CCL17 and CCL22 are expressed by malignant B-cells and may play a role in recruiting T-cells to interact with the malignant B-cells. CXCL13 is secreted by stromal cells and recruits malignant B-cells to the lymph nodes. In addition, IL-10 is produced by many normal immune cell types as well as by neoplastic B-cells. IL-10 is known to be an autocrine growth factor for B-cell lymphoma cell lines. These pharmacodynamic data provide further evidence for biological activity of IPI-145 in patients with CLL and iNHL and suggest both similarities and differences in how these two malignancies respond to IPI-145. The association of many of these pharmacodynamic factors with the tumor microenvironment suggests a mechanistic basis for the clinical observation of lymphocytosis and nodal reduction with IPI-145 treatment of CLL subjects. Cytokine, chemokine and MMP levels from patients in IPI-145-02 are being evaluated further for associations with multiple clinical parameters to determine if there is evidence for biomarkers predictive of efficacy and tolerability. Disclosures: Douglas: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Allison:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Ted:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Allen:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Kahl:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Horwitz:Celgene, Allos, Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genzyme, Kyowa, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene, Allos, Seattle Genetics, Kyowa, Infinty, Millenium: Research Funding. Flinn:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kelly:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Stern:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.

Description: Background The international prognostic score (IPS) (Hasenclever et al., NEJM 1988) uses 7 factors (age〉 45, male sex, hemoglobin 15,000, and lymphopenia〈 600) to predict a 5 year freedom from progression (FFP) of 42%-84% and overall survival (OS) of 56%-89% for patients with advanced HL. Constructed from a retrospective analysis of patients treated before 1992, the IPS continues to be the most commonly used risk stratification index for advanced HL. Recent studies suggest that the predictive range of the IPS has narrowed due to improved outcomes of patients treated with current therapy (Moccia et al. JCO 2012). In this report we prospectively evaluated the ability of the individual components of the IPS to predict outcome in patients enrolled on the US Intergroup trial E2496. Methods All seven IPS (IPS-7) variables were recorded for all patients at study entry. FFP was defined as the time from study entry to disease progression or relapse; deaths that occurred during remission that were not preceded by disease progression/relapse were censored. OS was defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to construct survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional-hazards models. We subsequently constructed an alternative prognostic score utilizing the factors which were significant on MVA (PS-3). Results From 1996-2006, 854 patients with advanced HL, were randomized to treatment with either ABVD or Stanford V, with no significant differences in outcome (Gordon et al, JCO 2013). While the IPS-7 remained prognostic it did not stratify the lowest risk patients (0-1 risk factor) or patients with 3-5 risk factors, as its predictive range was narrowed due to improved clinical outcomes (Fig 1a and 2a). Table 1 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis for IPS-7 and outcomes. In contrast to the original IPS-7, on MVA, only two factors, hemoglobin and stage were significant for FFP, and three factors for OS: hemoglobin, stage, and age. We then evaluated a new 3 factor score (PS-3) utilizing variables significant on the MVA. The PS-3 was significant for both FFP (p=0.0001) and OS (p

Description: Key Points This clinical study assessed idelalisib, a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in 64 patients with relapsed, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Idelalisib treatment rapidly induced durable disease responses in heavily pretreated patients with a favorable safety profile.

Description: Abstract 949 Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a highly variable outcome, and individual risk assessment is largely based on clinical features. Gene expression profiling (GEP) stratifies patients into those with germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell subtype (ABC) subtype with different prognoses. These groups have been shown to predict prognosis in patients treated with CHOP or R-CHOP. Conversely, the role of other recognized prognostic markers, such as BCL2 gene abnormalities or Bcl2 expression has been questioned in the new therapeutic era. Materials and Methods: In 438 patients treated with R-CHOP for de novo DLBCL, we analyzed the tumors by immunohistochemistry for Bcl2 protein expression and by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for BCL2 translocation and other abnormalities. All cases were successfully studied by GEP. The cutoff for Bcl2 protein expression, 60%, used as prognostic factor was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The t(14;18)(q32;q21) was detected in 82 cases (18.7%) and BCL2 gains occurred in 63 cases (14.3%). Both t(14;18) and BCL2 gains strongly correlated with higher levels of Bcl2 protein expression (p

Description: Abstract 235 Background: The RESORT trial (E4402) found comparable time to treatment failure (TTTF) and disease-related outcomes in previously untreated, indolent, follicular lymphoma randomized to maintenance rituximab (MR) versus rituximab retreatment (RR), and possible benefit of MR for patients with non-follicular lymphoma. The effects of MR versus RR on patient anxiety and health-related quality of life has not previously been examined. Methods: Pt received R 375 mg/m2 weekly × 4 and responders were randomized to MR (single dose R q 3 mo) or RR (R weekly × 4 at disease progression). Each strategy was continued until treatment failure. Participants enrolled after 5/2005 completed a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment. Patient preferences regarding treatment were measured at randomization using 4 patient self-report items developed for this trial. These 4 items asked patients to rate the extent to which medical visits and cancer treatment reduces their anxiety and increases perceived control, and the extent to which they prefer to avoid medical care due to an increase in anxiety in response to reminders of illness. Participants were categorized based on their responses as using “active coping” (medical care decreases anxiety) or “avoidant coping” (prefer to avoid medical care). Participants completed PRO assessment following R induction at randomization, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post-randomization, and at R failure. PRO assessment included standardized, validated questionnaires to measure general anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), post-traumatic stress-type anxiety (Impact of Events Scale-Revised, IES-R), and health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General, FACT-G). Individual items were selected from existing measures or were developed for this trial to assess illness-specific anxiety about the future (Illness Impact). Primary PRO analysis compared change scores from randomization-12 months between MR and RR treatment arms. Differences between participants categorized as using active or avoidant coping were also examined. Results: 253 patients (92% of E4402 randomized sample) completed PROs at randomization. 125 patients were randomized to MR and 128 were randomized to RR. Demographic and disease characteristics were comparable between arms. Median age 60 years, 54% female, 95% White. All patients PS 0–1; 83% follicular lymphoma, 17% non-follicular. The study had 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.4 for the primary endpoint (change scores randomization to 12 months). There were no statistically significant differences between MR and RR on (1) any PRO measure and (2) PRO change scores from randomization to 12 month follow-up (p=NS). Figure 1 illustrates HADS Anxiety scores and Figure 2 shows FACT-G scores from randomization-48 months. The proportion of participants exceeding established clinical cut-off scores on the HADS Anxiety and IES-R did not differ between MR and RR. At randomization, 70% of participants were categorized as using an avoidant coping style and 30% as using active coping. Among participants using avoidant coping, 6–10% exceeded HADS Anxiety clinical cut-off at randomization, 3, 6, and 12 month assessments, and 16% at R failure. A lower proportion of those using active coping (0–3%) reported clinically significant anxiety at all time points (p

Description: Abstract 155 Background Bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent, active as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab for relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This study compared efficacy and safety of bendamustine-rituximab (BR) with standard treatment regimens of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) in first-line treatment of patients with indolent NHL or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The primary objective was to determine whether the complete response rate for BR was noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP (presented separately). The present analysis reports results for quality of life (QOL) as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Methods Previously untreated patients with indolent NHL or MCL were randomized to receive BR (bendamustine 90 mg/m2/day on days 1 and 2; rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day cycle) or R-CHOP/R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (up to maximum 2 mg) on day 1 and prednisone at 100 mg on days 1–5 (of a 21-day cycle), plus either [1] cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 or [2] cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 or 1000 mg/m2(investigator choice) on day 1. QLQ-C30 was administered at screening (baseline); after cycles 1, 3, 6, 8; and at the end-of-treatment visit. Linear transformation to standardize raw scores was performed. The QLQ-C30 is composed of 5 multi-item functional scales, 1 global health status (GHS)/QOL scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single-item measures; all scores could range from 0 to 100. Rising scores for functional scales and GHS/QOL indicate improvement. Rising scores for symptom scales/single items indicate worsening. GHS/QOL score change at last QLQ-C30 administration postbaseline was interpreted using analysis of covariance. Data from the last observation (end-of-treatment visit) were analyzed. Results The 447 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments; 224 to BR (NHL n=187, MCL n=36, missing n=1) and 223 to R-CHOP/R-CVP (NHL n=184, MCL n=38, missing n=1). Treatment groups were well matched for demographic and clinical characteristics. Among all randomized patients, mean change in GHS/QOL score from baseline to final visit was significantly higher (indicating relative improvement) for patients treated with BR than those treated with R-CHOP/R-CVP (3.6 vs −5.1 respectively, P=0.0005). For patients with indolent NHL, mean change in GHS/QOL score by final visit was significantly higher in patients treated with BR than those receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP (2.1 vs −6.3, respectively, P=0.0021); in patients with MCL, mean change in GHS/QOL score was numerically higher in the BR group, but the difference was not statistically significant (10.9 vs 1.6, P=0.0654). All randomized patients receiving BR showed greater improvement in QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning (from baseline to final visit), compared with patients receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP. Mean change from baseline scores (± SEM) for QLQ-C30 for Cognitive, Physical, Role, and Social Functioning scales of the QLQ-C30 decreased (signifying deteriorating effect) in both treatment groups, with patients treated with BR deteriorating less than patients treated with R-CHOP/R-CVP (Figure). For symptom scales/item measures, patients treated with BR showed larger reductions in mean scores from elevated baseline levels (signifying greater improvement), compared with R-CHOP/R-CVP for Appetite Loss (−2.9 for BR vs −1.1 for R-CHOP/R-CVP), Pain (−5.6 vs −1.7), and Constipation (−0.7 vs 1.8). For symptom scales/item measures of Dyspnea, Fatigue, and Financial Difficulties, both treatments showed deteriorating effects, with BR showing less than R-CHOP/R-CVP: Dyspnea (0.8 vs 4.8), Fatigue (0.5 vs 7.2), and Financial Difficulties (0.9 vs 1.3). Patients receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP had larger reductions in mean scores for Insomnia (−2.1 for BR vs −6.7 for R-CHOP/R-CVP), Diarrhea (0.5 vs −1.3), and Nausea and Vomiting (1.8 vs 0.9). Conclusions In this study, BR significantly improved GHS/QOL, compared with R-CHOP/R-CVP treatment, in previously untreated patients with indolent NHL or MCL. In addition, BR provided improved patient QOL scores for most aspects of functioning and symptoms, as measured by the QLQ-C30. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Burke: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is FDA-approved for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Van der Jagt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Sponsorship Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Sponsorship, Sponsorship Other; Roche: Consultancy, Sponsorship, Sponsorship Other; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xanthus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kahl:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacDonald:Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. White:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Munteanu:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Clementi:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Chen:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Flinn:Teva: Research Funding.