ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Collection
Years
Year
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-02-08
    Description: Highlights • The SUGAR project has developed and tested various methods for gas production from marine gas hydrates from micro to field scale. • Numerical simulations improved the understanding of processes on molecular to reservoir scale. • Depressurization is a promising technology for exploiting gas hydrate deposits in the Danube Delta. • The injection of CO2 or CO2–N2 is not a suitable method for the exploitation of gas hydrate deposits in the Danube Delta. Abstract One important scientific objective of the national research project SUGAR – Submarine Gas Hydrate Reservoirs was the development, improvement, and test of innovative concepts for the production of methane from natural gas hydrate reservoirs. Therefore, different production methods, such as the thermal stimulation using in situ combustion, the chemical stimulation via injection of CO2 as a gaseous, liquid or supercritical phase and depressurization were tested alone or in combination at different scales. In the laboratory experiments these ranged from pore and hydrate grain scale to 425-L reactor volume, whereas numerical models were applied to describe the related processes from molecular to reservoir scale. In addition, the numerical simulations also evaluated the feasibility and efficiency of the application of these methods in selected areas, such as the Danube Paleodelta in the Black Sea, addressing the two dominant methane hydrate reservoir settings, buried channel-levee and turbidite systems. It turned out, that the injection of CO2 or a CO2–N2 gas mixture is not applicable for the Danube Paleodelta in the Black Sea, because the local pressure and temperature conditions are too close to the equilibrium conditions of both, the CO2 hydrate and a CO2–N2 mixed hydrate stability fields. Experiments using thermal stimulation and depressurization showed promising results but also some issues, such as sufficient heat transfer. In summary it can be said that the applicability and efficiency of each method has to be proven for each specific hydrate reservoir conditions. Based on the results obtained by numerical simulations the most promising and safe method for the production of CH4 from hydrate bearing sediments in the Danube Paleodelta would be the depressurization technique. This study summarizes the main experimental and modeling results.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: The "guest exchange"of methane (CH4) by carbon dioxide (CO2) in naturally occurring gas hydrates is seen as a possibility to concurrently produce CH4 and sequester CO2. Presently, process evaluation is based on CH4-CO2 exchange yields of small-or medium-scale laboratory experiments, mostly neglecting mass and heat transfer processes. This work investigates process efficiencies in two large-scale experiments (210 L sample volume) using fully water-saturated, natural reservoir conditions and a gas hydrate saturation of 50%. After injecting 50 kg of heated CO2 discontinuously (E1) and continuously (E2) and a subsequent soaking period, the reservoir was depressurized discontinuously. It was monitored using electrical resistivity, temperature and pressure sensors, and fluid flow and gas composition measurements. Phase and component inventories were analyzed based on mass and volume balances. The total CH4 production during CO2 injection was only 5% of the initial CH4 inventory. Prior to CO2 breakthrough, the produced CH4 roughly equaled dissolved CH4 in the produced pore water, which balanced the volume of the injected CO2. After CO2 breakthrough, CH4 ratios in the released CO2 quickly dropped to 2.0-0.5 vol %. The total CO2 retention was the highest just before the CO2 breakthrough and higher in E1 where discontinuous injection improved the distribution of injected CO2 and subsequent mixed hydrate formation. The processes were improved by the succession of CO2 injection by controlled degassing at stability limits below that of the pure CH4 hydrate, particularly in experiment E2. Here, a more heterogeneous distribution of liquid CO2 and larger availability of free water led to smaller initial degassing of liquid CO2. This allowed for quick re-formation of mixed gas hydrates and CH4 ratios of 50% in the produced gases. The experiments demonstrate the importance of fluid migration patterns, heat transport, sample inhomogeneity, and secondary gas hydrate formation in water-saturated sediments.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...